*******************************
The role of U.S. Government is NOT to provide "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness". The role of the U.S. Government is to provide happiness itself.
Spending should not be reduced on anything except military, in fact, spending needs to be increased to solve more and more problems and more and more grievances from an endless list of 'dis-enfranchised' people who deserve to have what anybody else has whether they've earned it or not. It's a matter of fundamental 'rights'.
Sarah Palin is not qualified to be Vice President, but Barack Obama is qualified to be President.
In 2007 the U.S. Government took in more tax revenue than ever before in our history, but our problem is not spending, our problem is that we need higher taxes.
Household's making $250,000 are wealthy, no matter where they live.
Raising taxes in a recession is smart.
More taxes and more spending are always good.
The U.N. will decide our foreign policy and we will go along with their wishes.
Nuclear energy is not safe. There have been no technological improvements since our last reactor application 30 years ago.
France is being reckless in supplying 80% of their energy with renewable and cheap nuclear power.
Drilling might kill some birds every 10 years so we shouldn't do it.
The U.S. is the Saudi Arabia of coal, but we should not use it.
"Wind and Solar" are all we need to do.
Republicans do not want us to be free from Middle East oil.
There is no looming problem with Social Security.
A "Social Security Crisis" is just scare tactics to take away benefits for old people. Republicans/Bush/McCain have always been against old people.
Maladies such as autism need to be researched and solved by the U.S. government with new funding (proposed by Barack Obama in the final debate). The government should fix everything with our tax dollars.
Barack Obama has taken a bold stand by announcing that he would reduce 'net' spending. Nobody knows what that means, but it sounds like exactly the right approach because he says it very forcefully.
Taxes on wealthy people should be higher in the name of 'fairness' even though they are already higher and wealthy people give more to charities. Obama's plan is 'pay as you go', so we can simply continue to raise taxes on these people in future years.
Wealthy people got wealthy by exploiting and trampling on the less fortunate, and must be made to pay. No wealthy people actually earned anything. Middle class and poor people should therefore hate wealthy people.
If people who can't afford children continue to have them, the U.S. Government should support them, it's only fair.
Taxes need to be higher on 'corporations' because corporations are evil. It doesn't matter if this adds cost to products or makes U.S. Corporations less competitive, they are evil.
Regulation is good, de-regulation is bad (even though Joe Biden voted in favor of the banking de-regulation).
This is the correct and 'fair' direction the country needs to go. When Obama is President, with control of the House, the Senate, and the majority of Governorships already in the hands of the Democrats, this is exactly what we're going to get, because this is what we deserve.
]]>